I've stopped debating with the evolutionist because he was not the challenge that he made himself out to be. Also, I don't have much time to do email debates at this point in my life. I didn't send my response because it seemed too obnoxious and I didn't want to lower myself to his level. But sometimes it's fun to get down and dirty. This blog will be the only place I will put this response.
The evolutionist:
Here is a quick write up on fossil formation. I think it goes a long way on explaining the shortage of certain types of life in the fossil record.
http://www.scienceviews.com/dinosaurs/fossilformation.html
The evolutionist:
Here is a quick write up on fossil formation. I think it goes a long way on explaining the shortage of certain types of life in the fossil record.
http://www.scienceviews.com/
What I wanted to send, but thought was best not to:
I used to read this kind of information when I was nine years old! If you were serious about this link, then you've just betrayed your lack of scientific training. This is not the kind of information that you'd give to serious, science-oriented adults. Yes, it's easy to fool children with the idea that decomposing bodies in the water are buried over a period of time and then become fossilized. If you didn't catch it earlier, there is no shortage of fossils, just a shortage of fossils that support evolutionary theory.
I've come to the conclusion that you don't seem to read too well, that you don't catch context and details. You assume too much or at worst, twist things irrationally. To debaters, that's usually a sign of desperation. At this point, I won't continue on the grounds that you are plugging your ears and saying lalala, intellectually speaking that is, and I also have to lay off from this discussion indefinitely because of my busy schedule. I'm not conceding, of course. Believe me, I enjoy this stuff. I just find it frustrating to seriously discuss matters, not because you stump me. Far from it. I find that you are uninformed of the issues and intricacies involved in this debate and I'm not one to teach the basics to my opponent. You've proven to me that you're a neophyte and, sadly, one that's totally indoctrinated by an emaciated public education system.
Once again, I have nothing against you. I'll play games with you, I just won't discuss serious scientific issues with you.
No comments:
Post a Comment